linux-kernel - Re: [patch/rfc] implement memmem() locally in kallsyms.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:36:57 +0200
From:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To:	"Mike Frysinger" <vapier@...too.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] implement memmem() locally in kallsyms.c

On 07/06/07, Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org> wrote:
> This patch basically copies the gnulib version of memmem() into
> scripts/kallsyms.c.  While a useful function, it isn't in POSIX so some
> systems (like Darwin) choose to omit it.  How do others feel ?
>

Do people actually build Linux kernels on Darwin & *BSD systems? If
they do then why?

What I'm getting at is; why do we care if it will build there?

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/