[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706070822590.17588@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 08:28:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: why is it called "asm-generic/atomic.h"?
i'm just curious -- why does that particular header file have that
name? its opening comment reads:
* Allows to provide arch independent atomic definitions without the need to
* edit all arch specific atomic.h files.
but that's *not* what that header file does. rather, it simply
defines the "long" form of the atomic operations that can be used *in
addition to* the arch-specific ones.
wouldn't it make more sense to have called that header file
something like "asm-generic/atomic_long.h", so as not to mislead folks
into thinking it represented an *alternative* to those other header
files?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists