[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070607124507.79d8da54.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:45:07 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>, Stephen Tweedie <sct@...hat.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext3fs: umount+sync not enough to guarantee metadata-on-disk
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:11:58 -0400
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 06/07/2007 11:41 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> mount /var/lib/mythtv -oremount,ro
> >> sync
> >> umount /var/lib/mythtv
> >
> > Did this succeed? If the application is still truncating that file, the
> > umount should have failed.
>
> Shouldn't sync should wait for truncate to finish?
I can't think of anything in there at present which would cause that to
happen, and it's not immediately obvious how we _could_ make it happen - we
have an inode which potentially has no dirty pages and which is itself
clean. The truncate can span multiple journal commits, so forcing a
journal commit in sync() won't necessarily block behind the truncate.
I guess we could ask sync to speculatively take and release every inode's
i_mutex or something. But even that would involve quite some hoop-jumping
due to those infuriating spinlock-protected list_heads on the superblock.
hmm.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists