[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070607200931.GB22230@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:09:31 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm1
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 07:02:23PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> It'Greg KH napsal(a):
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 05:54:13PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> Tejun Heo napsal(a):
> >>> Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >>>> Tejun Heo napsal(a):
> >>>>> Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >>>>>> Yes. Now I'm compiling -rc4-mm2.
> >>>>> It's probably caused by new sysfs slimdown patches and I'm pretty sure
> >>>>> -rc4-mm2 would fail the same way. The offending one should be one of
> >>>>> the following patches.
> >>>> There's reverted gregkh-driver-block-device in -mm2. So I wanted to give it a
> >>>> try. Do you think it's pointless and that patch has no impact on the behaviour?
> >>> I'm not familiar with how lvm vgscan works and the patch does look like
> >>> it can affect that. Please give a shot at -mm2.
> >> Yup, it works without any further patches. So it seems like
> >> gregkh-driver-block-device is the culprit?
> >
> > Culprit for what kind of symptom? Is CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED enabled?
> > If not, can you try that?
>
> LVM (lvm whatever) writes can't initialize lock 1 and quits.
>
> SYSFS_DEPRECATED solves the issue (-rc4-mm2 minus the revert + SYSFS_DEPRECATED).
Great, thanks for letting us know.
Kay, what userspace tool is involved here that is getting confused?
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists