[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46687598.2040701@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:16:08 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
CC: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>> although it's not clear where in the source tree are the invocations
>>> that would actually make a difference to a MIPS system, which is why
>>> i've CC'ed ralf on this. i'm sure he can clear this up. :-)
>
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 10:32:29AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> x86 could also benefit from coloured zeropages. In fact, I thought it
>> already had them (K8 wants as many as 8.)
>
> How would one demonstrate the beneficial effect of such?
Dean Gaudet at Transmeta did some benchmarking using SPEC. If I recall
his numbers correctly (this is from memory, mind you) on Transmeta
Efficeon, which has 2-way virtual cache tagging with hardware recovery,
zeropage coloring was a 1.5% performance improvement.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists