lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:29:23 +1000 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> To: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>, Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: signalfd API issues (was Re: [PATCH/RFC] signal races/bugs, losing TIF_SIGPENDING and other woes) On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 22:20 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 08:43:42AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > What Ben was talking about was stealing a synchronous SEGV from a task > > without stopping it, and as Ben says that makes no sense. > > Intercepting a signal and stopping the task is reasonable, and that is > > what ptrace does, and I assume also UML. > > It is, but I can also see UML stealing the SEGV from the child. The > UML skas does this - a ptrace extension, PTRACE_FAULTINFO, is used to > extract page fault information from the child, and other pieces of the > patch are used to fix the fault without the child continuing until > it's fixed. So, in this case, the child never sees the SEGV. But you use ptrace and don't steal signals with dequeue_signal() on a live other task, which is ok. Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists