linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4667ADDA.2070202@de.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 07 Jun 2007 09:03:54 +0200
From:	Martin Peschke <mp3@...ibm.com>
To:	"Bill Huey (hui)" <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, jbaron@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down

Bill Huey (hui) wrote:
 > There are roughly about 400 locks in a normal kernel for a desktop. The
 > list is rather cumbersome anyways so, IMO, it really should be handled
 > by parsing tools, etc... There could be more properties attached to each
 > lock especially if you intend to get this to work on -rt which need more
 > things reported.

Adding stuff to an already wide table in a readable fashion is more difficult
than making a list longer.

Do mean I might submit this stuff for -rt?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/