[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4669079B.3030408@de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:39:07 +0200
From: Carsten Otte <cotte@...ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jared Hulbert <jaredeh@...il.com>, carsteno@...ibm.com,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
richard.griffiths@...driver.com,
Richard Griffiths <res07ml0@...izon.net>,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> And for thus just wanting to take a quick glance, this is the
> diff vs an out of tree cramfs where uncompress.c and cramfs_fs_sb.h
> are merged into inode.c:
Mkay, I am convinced. Either cramfs should be based on a block device
that does have direct_access() for xip, or the code needs to be
forked. Looks like a sane approach to me.
so long,
Carsten
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists