[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070608102250.GE4943@implementation>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 18:22:50 +0800
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH] Oddity in mxcsr_feature_mask_init()
Hi,
In arch/i386/kernel/i387.c:mxcsr_feature_mask_init(), one can read:
asm volatile("fxsave %0" : : "m" (current->thread.i387.fxsave));
But I would rather have written:
asm("fxsave %0" : "=m" (current->thread.i387.fxsave));
Considering the code around, it doesn't do much difference, but it makes
more sense (i.e. we just fill fxsave).
Samuel
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
--- linux-2.6.21-orig/arch/i386/kernel/i387.c.orig 2007-06-08 18:18:10.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.21-orig/arch/i386/kernel/i387.c 2007-06-08 18:18:22.000000000 +0800
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
clts();
if (cpu_has_fxsr) {
memset(¤t->thread.i387.fxsave, 0, sizeof(struct i387_fxsave_struct));
- asm volatile("fxsave %0" : : "m" (current->thread.i387.fxsave));
+ asm("fxsave %0" : "=m" (current->thread.i387.fxsave));
mask = current->thread.i387.fxsave.mxcsr_mask;
if (mask == 0) mask = 0x0000ffbf;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists