[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <466930D2.9010104@dthaler.de>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:34:58 +0200
From: Daniel Thaler <daniel@...aler.de>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
tglx@...utronix.de, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 03/54] NOHZ: Rate limit the local softirq pending warning
output
Chris Wright wrote:
> -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> ---------------------
>
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> The warning in the NOHZ code, which triggers when a CPU goes idle with
> softirqs pending can fill up the logs quite quickly. Rate limit the output
> until we found the root cause of that problem.
Isn't the root cause found and fixed with "[patch 09/54] Prevent going
idle with softirq pending"?
- Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists