[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706081822350.10769@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 18:25:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Should "cleanpatch" clean up stretches of space?
On Jun 8 2007 09:12, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Right now I have "cleanspace" and "cleanpatch" clean up spaces before
>tabs, but it does not compress runs of spaces that aren't followed by a tab.
>
>I could make it do that; I was being conservative when I wrote it and
>opted for it not to do so, but I wanted to hear if people think it
>should (and if so, what should a reasonable threshold be, in addition
>for obviously crossing a tab line? Two spaces? Three? Four? Eight?)
Exactly. Linus (see CodingStyle) thinks non-8-tabs are heretic movements,
but well, let those people have their fun.
People should not be forced (by means of checker scripts that are officially
endorsed) to compress / {8}/ into a \t. In fact, people should not even
assume a tab is 8 when writing code. Instead,
\t while (foo) {
\t \t bar = some_function_with_lots_of_args(par1, par2, par3,
\t \t \x20+ par4, par5, par6);
\t }
\t should be used for "leading indent" only. Too bad almost noone cares.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists