linux-kernel - Re: divorce CONFIG_X86_PAE from CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:41:56 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: divorce CONFIG_X86_PAE from CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:35:51 -0700 William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com> wrote:

> PAE is useful for more than supporting more than 4GB RAM. It supports
> expanded swapspace and NX executable protections. Some users may want
> NX or expanded swapspace support without the overhead or instability
> of highmem. For these reasons, the following patch divorces
> CONFIG_X86_PAE from CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G.

Do (CONFIG_X86_PAE && !CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G) and (!CONFIG_X86_PAE && CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G)
kernels actually work?  I wouldn't be surprised if there are places where we used
the incorrect one.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/