[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070608204836.5adaefa7@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 20:48:36 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
> So, what do you plan to do? Those handle won't be zero-based. Your
> "working" system I immagine will do:
>
> bleeh[handle - BASE].duh = ...;
>
> How nice for a working system. If you *store* the handle returned by the
> OS, and you *use* the handle to call for OS services, you will be fine
> independently from the value handed out by the OS.
Well there are two ways I'd do this
#1: Throw the whole thing away and accept its not a good idea anyway
#2: If I was really going this way and I wanted to use it for serious
tricks for high performance I/O then I'd provide the handle from
userspace so that the strategy for allocation is controlled by the caller
who is the only one who can make the smart decisions
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists