[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706081558090.4373@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 15:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de, muli@...ibm.com,
asit.k.mallick@...el.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, ashok.raj@...el.com, shaohua.li@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [Intel-IOMMU 02/10] Library routine for pre-allocat pool handling
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Why was it not allowed? Because interrupts are disabled?
>
> Allocating memory during page out under low memory could
> lead to deadlocks. That is because Linux used to make no attempt
> to limit dirty pages for anonymous mappings and then you could
> end up with most of your memory dirty and not enough
> memory cleanable for page out and then when page out
> needs more memory you could be dead.
>
> [yes that implies that mmap over NFS was always broken]
Right. We got that fixed in 2.6.19.
> Now there is a anon dirty limit since a few releases, but I'm not
> fully convinced it solves the problem completely.
A gut feeling or is there more?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists