linux-kernel - Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070609123645.ce332cac.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
Date:	Sat, 9 Jun 2007 12:36:45 -0400
From:	Sean <seanlkml@...patico.ca>
To:	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
Cc:	david@...g.hm, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, jjohansen@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation,
 pathname matching

On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 17:17:57 +0200
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de> wrote:

> On Saturday 09 June 2007 10:10, Sean wrote:
> > Clinging to the current AA implementation instead of honestly considering
> > reasonable alternatives does not inspire confidence or teamwork.
> 
> What you imply is pretty insulting. I can assure you we looked into many 
> possible implementation choices, and we considered a fair number of 
> alternatives.

Sorry for any unintended insult.  The comment was meant solely for the person
with whom i was talking who seemed only to be cheerleading for inclusion
in current form without being willing or able to discuss alternative
implementations.

Sean.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/