[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1181412502.4404.359.camel@chaos>
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:08:22 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Rodrigo Luiz <troops.of.doom@...il.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@...monizer.de>,
Gary Zambrano <zambrano@...adcom.com>,
Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [1/3] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v2
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:40 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Subject : nanosleep(0) behaviour
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/27/108
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/4/239
> Submitter : Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@...monizer.de>
> Handled-By : Gary Zambrano <zambrano@...adcom.com>
> Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Status : problem is being debugged
Please remove this. The behavior is correct and it just affects buggy
applications like iperf, which used usleep(0) as a yield. iperf is fixed
by now.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists