lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 10 Jun 2007 00:26:39 +0530
From:	"Satyam Sharma" <>
To:	"Jan Engelhardt" <>
Cc:	"Jon Masters" <>,
	"Robert P. J. Day" <>,
	"Kyle McMartin" <>,
	"Christoph Pleger" <>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <>
Subject: Re: Size of kernel modules

On 6/9/07, Jan Engelhardt <> wrote:
> On Jun 9 2007 08:08, Jon Masters wrote:
> >
> >So I missed half of this conversation - you're saying that on a
> >CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, you have such large .ko module files that depmod
> >segfaults? Can I get a core dump or any further information? :-)
> Just make sure your /lib/modules/<kernel> is like 300 megabytes or even
> more. Then depmod will clog up quite a lot memory already. (Taking a 256 mb ram
> machine for example, no swap or just very little.)

Yup, this would happen reproducibly on a machine with <= 256MB
RAM and swap disabled, when building a large enough modular kernel.
The depmod at end of modules_install would invariably invoke the OOM
killer, and get itself shot (taking down the shell with it, often) ...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists