[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <787b0d920706082112v25fb118ew3556eb868c118c1c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 00:12:25 -0400
From: "Albert Cahalan" <acahalan@...il.com>
To: "Eric Dumazet" <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Davide Libenzi" <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Subject: Re: JIT emulator needs
On 6/8/07, Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:
> Albert Cahalan a écrit :
> > Additions to better support JIT emulators:
> >
> > a. sysctl to set IPC_RMID by default
>
> Not very good, this will break some apps.
As a sysctl, the admin gets to choose between
compatibility and sanity.
I can see such a sysctl also being really helpful for a
shared computer used for an Operating Systems or
System Programming course.
> > b. shmget() flag to set IPC_RMID by default
>
> This is better :)
Both are good. This one requires that all apps using
SysV shared memory be modified to use the flag.
The other requires that a very few apps be modified
to tolerate a behavior change.
> > c. open() flag to unlink a file before returning the fd
>
>
> Well, I assume you would like fd = open("/path/somefile", O_RDWR | O_CREAT |
> O_UNLINK, 0644)
>
> (ie allocate a file handle but no name ?)
Yes.
> Quite difficult to implement this atomically with current vfs, maybe a new
> syscall would be better. (Linus will kill me for that :) )
>
> (We dont need to insert "somefile" in one directory, then unlink it, we only
> need to allocate an unnamed inode to get some backing store)
I suspect that SMB/CIFS has a native call for this. There is
some sort of tmpfile flag defined over in that world.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists