linux-kernel - Re: [0/1] [patch -mm] Add containerstats (v3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6599ad830706090009q25e13ff6ybad7d7f7db21cd48@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 9 Jun 2007 00:09:55 -0700
From:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Balbir Singh" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Linux Containers" <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Pavel Emelianov" <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [0/1] [patch -mm] Add containerstats (v3)

On 6/8/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:43:46 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > This patch implements per container statistics infrastructure and re-uses
> > code from the taskstats interface.
>
> boggle.
>
> Symbol: CONTAINERS [=y]
>   Selected by: CONTAINER_DEBUG || CPUSETS && SMP || CONTAINER_CPUACCT
>
> Paul, that's just bizarre.  How come it was done this way?

Containers on their own without any subsystems aren't hugely useful.
So the plan was that any container subsystem would "select CONTAINERS"
to cause the container framework to be built. I'm happy to change it
to invert the dependencies if you'd prefer.

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/