linux-kernel - Re: [0/1] [patch -mm] Add containerstats (v3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6599ad830706090120i6ba8686ep1abffd6cc4cd81e3@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 9 Jun 2007 01:20:55 -0700
From:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Balbir Singh" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Linux Containers" <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Pavel Emelianov" <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [0/1] [patch -mm] Add containerstats (v3)

On 6/9/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Would it not be simplest to have CONTAINERS as the top-level
> user-configurable item and to then have everything else depend on it?
>

Yes, OK - it can go that way around too. I guess my thought was that
people would be more interested in enabling/disabling the subsystems
themselves (cpusets, RSS, etc) than the underlying framework. But if
select has problems then it's no trouble to invert it.

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/