linux-kernel - Re: -ck patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:52:40 +0100
From:	Celso <celsopr@...il.com>
To:	Miguel Figueiredo <elmig@...ianpt.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: -ck patch | Feedback

Sáb, 2007-06-09 às 10:30 +0100, Miguel Figueiredo escreveu:
> Celso wrote:
> > Hello, I'm using -ck since... along time ago (I start using it with the
> > kernel 2.6.16) . I started using it with Ubuntu and  the response of the
> > system  was better. Since that I always compile my kernels with -ck.
> > Actually I use 2.6.20-ck1 and I have no problems, even with things that
> > needs kernel-sources like gspca for my webcam.
> > 
> > Thanks a lot for the patches. 
> > 
> > PS: when will this go into the official kernel?
> > 
> 
> Hi there,
> 
>   have you tryied a newer kernel with -ck2 [1] ?
> 
> I am also using a -ck patch, 2.6.21-ck2, mostly on 2 machines where i
> use as desktop and also play games. With -ck2 the experience seems less
> slugish and more smooth while playing 'second life' and have a bunch of
> other programs open (mail, a zillion web pages, irc client, feed reader,
> consoles, ...).
> The desktop seems more confortable to use than with the vanilla kernel.
> I also tryed cfs, it's also much better than the vanilla kernel but i
> still prefer -ck2 for playing second life as it feels more responsive.
> 
> 
> If you try the -ck2 or SD 1.0 please report your experience. It's nice
> to hear that people are testing/using these improvements on desktop usage.
> 
> 
> 
> 1 - ck2 patch to add to vanilla 2.6.21,
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck2/patch-2.6.21-ck2.bz2
> 
> PS: I remember i read somewhere that the SD patch (included in -ck) has
> became stable (version 1.0) with a few small improvements!
> 

Well, I upgrade to 2.6.21-ck2 and install it on my two pcs (I had before
2.6.20-ck1 on both) and the installation work, like always, fine. No
problems. On the pc I use most (the better one :) ) I didn't feel much
difference from 2.6.20-ck1 to 2.6.21-ck2 (for regular Desktop use), but
in the older pc, where my brother works, he says that was even more
"fluid"*.

* direct translation sorry if it doesn't sound well

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/