linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] Cleanup code to replace DPRINTK with pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070610105024.b16d1708.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Sun, 10 Jun 2007 10:50:24 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Jack Stone <jack@...keye.stone.uk.eu.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, raven@...maw.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Cleanup code to replace DPRINTK with pr_debug

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:18:31 +0100 Jack Stone wrote:

> This patch series replaces DPRINTK with pr_debug in alternative.c,
> autofs, autofs4
> and ncpfs. A new function called pr_err is also added to keep
> functionality in
> ncpfs. The last 2 patches add support for pr_debug_pid and apply it to
> autofs4 to
> keep the output the same as the current DPRINTK statements.
> 
> All patches have been compile tested but not boot tested

Hi,

Doesn't this move printk-debug control from local source files
(i.e., targeted, specific ones) to a more global control (DEBUG)?

If so, I don't see that as a generally good thing.

If not, please correct me and tell me how this is useful to just
one instance of using pr_debug() in say, ncpfs, without pr_debug()
being enabled throughout the entire kernel tree.

Thanks.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/