[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706092047270.23139@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 20:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Al Viro wrote:
> > >
> > > Eww... Idea of pipe(2) taking flags as argument...
> >
> > Right. That was one of the patches, and it was one that I said was too
> > damn ugly to live.
> >
> > So I instead suggested the alternate approach of adding a single new
> > system call that runs another system call indirectly, with a set of flags
> > and/or other behaviour modifications.
>
> What if we put a data section in the vdso and we let userspace set the
> flags or whatever in there? Syslets could use one of those bits to set the
> "threadlet mode" w/out calling a syscall at all.
> In that way we have no new syscalls whatsoever. No?
Uhh, never mind :) That won't work in the vdso. Maybe in a TLS area.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists