[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070610214138.3d17be8a.diegocg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:41:38 +0200
From: Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Tsugikazu Shibata <tshibata@...jp.nec.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: kconfig .po files in kernel tree? [Was: Documentation/HOWTO
translated into Japanese]
El Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:52:28 +0200, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> escribió:
> I advocated that they should stay out back then.
> But on the other hand I do not see it causing much troubles
> having scripts/kconfig/po/da.po etc araound.
>
> Any opinion about the .po files?
These days the configuration menus are not something that users need to
read, they're more like a developer tool. IMO there's not much value in it,
because the people who read it already know english most of the times.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists