linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.21 numa policy and huge pages not working

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070610045145.GA6909@holomorphy.com>
Date:	Sat, 9 Jun 2007 21:51:45 -0700
From:	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To:	dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.21 numa policy and huge pages not working

On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:10:51PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
> ok i've narrowed it some... maybe.
> in commit 8ef8286689c6b5bc76212437b85bdd2ba749ee44 things work fine, numa 
> policy is respected...
> the very next commit bc56bba8f31bd99f350a5ebfd43d50f411b620c7 breaks shm 
> badly causing the test program to oops the kernel.
> commit 516dffdcd8827a40532798602830dfcfc672294c fixes that breakage but 
> numa policy is no longer respected.
> i've added the authors of those two commits to the recipient list and 
> reattached the test program.  hopefully someone can shed light on the 
> problem.

Thanks, this helps a lot.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/