[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070610105712.GA4695@ucw.cz>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 10:57:12 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Andi Drebes <lists-receive@...grammierforen.de>,
kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE
Hi!
> > > > Any reason to not just replace ACPI_RSD_TABLE_SIZE with ARRAY_SIZE?
> >
> > Probably because ARRAY_SIZE doesn't exist in ACPICA, which is
> > where this code comes from...
> >
> > When we change syntax in ACPICA files in Linux to make it more "beautiful",
> > then it creates more work for me -- as forever on, that syntax difference
> > must be manually compared to upstream ACPICA and Linux -- and that syntax
> > difference causes upstream patches to no longer apply and require
> > hand merging.
>
> Or we could stop that ACPCICA crap ASAP. The acpi code not only looks
> like crap because of that but it's buggy as hell now.
+1.
Len, acpi subsystem is old enough to live by kernel standards, and
important enough that it should look&feel like a kernel code. It also
does not seem to change quickly, so merging patches should not be a
big deal.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists