[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070611174121.GA31647@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:41:21 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [RFC] Runtime allocation of PCI resources
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 08:11:24PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> writes:
>
> > BIOS authors don't always program all the features of hardware. This is
> > often the case for Intel IDE controllers, which are usually able to run
> > in AHCI mode but are rarely configured to do so. Reprogramming them is
> > easy enough other than the requirement for some MMIO space. If the BIOS
> > hasn't allocated this, it's necessary for us to do so manually.
>
> Traditionally we've had bad experiences forcing hardware to do something
> the BIOS didn't consider. e.g. occasionally the BIOS has good reasons
> to not allow it; maybe it knows about some errata or other problem
> the kernel doesn't.
AHCI is generally disabled because it makes Windows insanely difficult
to install. I'm not aware of any hardware issues in this case.
> I tried something similar some time ago for the IOMMU aperture.
> It turned out that some systems put something into the e820 holes
> and didn't boot anymore if you put something else in there.
> Your resource allocation will just do that.
>
> You might be lucky because your resources are typically
> small (IOMMU aperture was 64+MB) or you might not.
Hm. Yes, that would be a problem (sigh BIOS authors).
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists