[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070611185658.GA19095@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:56:58 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, efault@....de,
kernel@...ivas.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
pwil3058@...pond.net.au, tingy@...umass.edu, tong.n.li@...el.com,
wli@...omorphy.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dmitry.adamushko@...il.com, balbir@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] Introduce struct sched_entity and struct lrq
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> >
> > struct sched_entity
> > stores essential attributes/execution-history used by CFS core
> > to drive fairness between 'schedulable entities' (tasks, users etc)
>
> Wouldn't this be sensible to integrate into CFS _regardless_ of
> anything else?
yeah, that's what i asked Srivatsa to do, and his currently patchset
largely achieves that. I'm looking now into applying the core bits and
checking that it's in essence a NOP when this isnt used. (that makes the
later merging of group fairness and container scheduling a lot less
contentious)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists