[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070611120034.f6d972de.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:00:34 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Christian Leber <christian@...er.de>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:08:17 +0200
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>
> Starting beeper as soon as ACPI sleep returns is very useful in
> debugging "apparently dead" machines. If it beeps at all, it makes
> sense to start playing with CMOS tracer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
>
> diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S b/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S
> index b781b38..cbf136e 100644
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S
> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S
> @@ -11,7 +11,22 @@ # Do we need to deal with A20? It is oka
> #
> # If physical address of wakeup_code is 0x12345, BIOS should call us with
> # cs = 0x1234, eip = 0x05
> -#
> +#
> +
> +#define BEEP \
> + inb $97, %al; \
> + outb %al, $0x80; \
> + movb $3, %al; \
> + outb %al, $97; \
> + outb %al, $0x80; \
> + movb $-74, %al; \
> + outb %al, $67; \
> + outb %al, $0x80; \
> + movb $-119, %al; \
> + outb %al, $66; \
> + outb %al, $0x80; \
> + movb $15, %al; \
> + outb %al, $66;
>
> ALIGN
> .align 4096
> @@ -20,6 +35,9 @@ wakeup_code:
> wakeup_code_start = .
> .code16
>
> +# Uncomment this to make your computer start producing ugly noise as soon
> +# as BIOS returns to this real-mode entry point.
> +# BEEP
> movw $0xb800, %ax
> movw %ax,%fs
> movw $0x0e00 + 'L', %fs:(0x10)
>
How does the beep get turned off again?
Should the BEEP line be uncommented (in -mm at least)?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists