[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706112239080.19578@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:44:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
Steve Fox <drfickle@...ibm.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move the kernel to 16MB for NUMA-Q
On Jun 11 2007 12:01, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Jun 11 2007 10:36, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> Picking the 16 MB base is a bit obnoxious on small-memory machines, 4 MB
>>> would probably be a more reasonable base. Of course, 16 MB would avoid
>>> the issue of the handful of machines with memory holes at 15-16 MB.
>>
>> How will this work at all with a 5 MB machine?
>
>Does current kernels work at all on a 5 MB machine?
>
>(I used Linux on a 5 MB machine many years ago, but modern kernels are a
>different issue...)
Yes, I ran an unmodified 2.6.13 with a minimal but somewhat minimal
userspace (sash, glibc) on an fpu-less 386.
http://jengelh.hopto.org/GFX/mach/386sx.jpg
http://jengelh.hopto.org/GFX/mach/proc386.jpg
(yay, 3.09 bogomips and a totally incapable processor :p)
Have not tried more recent kernels yet though.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists