[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1181597696.22671.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:34:54 -0500
From: Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>
To: dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de, clameter@....com
Subject: [shm][hugetlb] Fix get_policy for stacked shared memory files
Here's another breakage as a result of shared memory stacked files :(
The NUMA policy for a VMA is determined by checking the following (in the order
given):
1) vma->vm_ops->get_policy() (if defined)
2) vma->vm_policy (if defined)
3) task->mempolicy (if defined)
4) Fall back to default_policy
By switching to stacked files for shared memory, get_policy() is now always set
to shm_get_policy which is a wrapper function. This causes us to stop at step
1, which yields NULL for hugetlb instead of task->mempolicy which was the
previous (and correct) result.
This patch modifies the shm_get_policy() wrapper to maintain steps 1-3 for the
wrapped vm_ops. Andi and Christoph, does this look right to you?
Signed-off-by: Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>
diff --git a/ipc/shm.c b/ipc/shm.c
index 4fefbad..8d2672d 100644
--- a/ipc/shm.c
+++ b/ipc/shm.c
@@ -254,8 +254,10 @@ struct mempolicy *shm_get_policy(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
if (sfd->vm_ops->get_policy)
pol = sfd->vm_ops->get_policy(vma, addr);
- else
+ else if (vma->vm_policy)
pol = vma->vm_policy;
+ else
+ pol = current->mempolicy;
return pol;
}
#endif
--
Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com)
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists