[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070611094638.GA18008@araj-amd64.jf.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:46:39 -0700
From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de, muli@...ibm.com,
asit.k.mallick@...el.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, ashok.raj@...el.com, shaohua.li@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [Intel-IOMMU 02/10] Library routine for pre-allocat pool handling
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 02:14:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Again, if dma_map_{single|sg} API's fails due to
> > failure to allocate memory, the only thing that can
> > be done is to panic as this is what few of the other
> > IOMMU implementation is doing today.
>
> If the only option is to panic then something's busted. If it's network IO
> then there should be a way of dropping the frame. If it's disk IO then we
> should report the failure and cause an IO error.
Just looking at the code.. appears that quite a few popular ones (or should say most) dont even look at the dma_addr_t returned to check for failure.
Thats going to be another major cleanup work.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists