| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <cab9a6fd0706111517i4dd4e3bdu6664e4b684b95e48@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:17:52 +0100 From: "Miguel Pais" <miguelpais@...il.com> To: "Miguel Figueiredo" <elmig@...ianpt.org> Cc: Celso <celsopr@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc4-ck1 - Re: -ck patch | Feedback Hi there, After a lot of good feedback about the -ck patch from Celso Ramos, I decided to try my chances and see for myself the difference. I had a few problems to struggle first, but nothing to do with ck... When I finally rebooted my Pentium4 computer, I truly noticed a difference in the loading time of the operating system. I can be mistaken, but it appeared to me a gain of 1,50 % of the loading speed. On a graphic environment the changes are more difficult to notice, and I may be wrong if I say it's faster, just because I'm expecting to see speed improvements. By the way, I'm using it on a 2.6.21 kernel. Many thanks to the developers, Miguel Pais On 6/10/07, Miguel Figueiredo <elmig@...ianpt.org> wrote: > Celso wrote: > > Sáb, 2007-06-09 às 10:30 +0100, Miguel Figueiredo escreveu: > >> Celso wrote: > >>> Hello, I'm using -ck since... along time ago (I start using it with the > >>> kernel 2.6.16) . I started using it with Ubuntu and the response of the > >>> system was better. Since that I always compile my kernels with -ck. > >>> Actually I use 2.6.20-ck1 and I have no problems, even with things that > >>> needs kernel-sources like gspca for my webcam. > >>> > >>> Thanks a lot for the patches. > >>> > >>> PS: when will this go into the official kernel? > >>> > >> Hi there, > >> > >> have you tryied a newer kernel with -ck2 [1] ? > >> > >> I am also using a -ck patch, 2.6.21-ck2, mostly on 2 machines where i > >> use as desktop and also play games. With -ck2 the experience seems less > >> slugish and more smooth while playing 'second life' and have a bunch of > >> other programs open (mail, a zillion web pages, irc client, feed reader, > >> consoles, ...). > >> The desktop seems more confortable to use than with the vanilla kernel. > >> I also tryed cfs, it's also much better than the vanilla kernel but i > >> still prefer -ck2 for playing second life as it feels more responsive. > >> > >> > >> If you try the -ck2 or SD 1.0 please report your experience. It's nice > >> to hear that people are testing/using these improvements on desktop usage. > >> > >> > >> > >> 1 - ck2 patch to add to vanilla 2.6.21, > >> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck2/patch-2.6.21-ck2.bz2 > >> > >> PS: I remember i read somewhere that the SD patch (included in -ck) has > >> became stable (version 1.0) with a few small improvements! > >> > > > > Well, I upgrade to 2.6.21-ck2 and install it on my two pcs (I had before > > 2.6.20-ck1 on both) and the installation work, like always, fine. No > > problems. On the pc I use most (the better one :) ) I didn't feel much > > difference from 2.6.20-ck1 to 2.6.21-ck2 (for regular Desktop use), but > > in the older pc, where my brother works, he says that was even more > > "fluid"*. > > > > * direct translation sorry if it doesn't sound well > > > > I don't know if there is an official announcement of patch releases but > today i spotted and started to use the new 2.6.22-rc4-ck1. > > The list of patches included on 2.6.22-rc4-ck1 it's on > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/pre-releases/2.6.22-rc4/2.6.22-rc4-ck1/patches/ > > It's working... > > > -- > > Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, > > Miguel Figueiredo > http://www.DebianPT.org > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists