linux-kernel - Re: kconfig .po files in kernel tree? [Was: Documentation/HOWTO translated into Japanese]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070611060259.GA914@suse.de>
Date:	Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:02:59 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
	Tsugikazu Shibata <tshibata@...jp.nec.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: kconfig .po files in kernel tree? [Was: Documentation/HOWTO
	translated into Japanese]

On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 07:52:28PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:22:21AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > >  Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
> > >  personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
> > >  tree and then perhaps keep translations on a website somewhere. So the
> > >  authoritative docs stay in the tree, in english, so that as many
> > >  contributors as possible can read and update them. It would then be a
> > >  seperate project to generate translations and keep them updated
> > >  according to what's in the tree.  Perhaps we could get the kernel.org
> > >  people to create an official space for that and then place a pointer
> > >  to that site in Documentation/ somewhere.
> > 
> > No, I think the translated files should be in the tree proper, we have
> > the space :)
> 
> We once discussed about .po files for kconfig and back then
> the conclusion was not to keep them in the kernel tree.
> 
> I advocated that they should stay out back then.
> But on the other hand I do not see it causing much troubles
> having scripts/kconfig/po/da.po etc araound.
> 
> Any opinion about the .po files?

I have no objection for them to be around in the tree, it might help out
some users who want to build their own kernels, and allow the -stable
kernels to catch up on the translations.

So I would encourage their addition, if possible.

thanks,

greg 'not everyone speaks english' k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/