linux-kernel - Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <466CEFBA.7090807@netone.net.tr>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:46:18 +0300
From:	Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>,
	"david@...g.hm" <david@...g.hm>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 05:21:53PM +0300, Tarkan Erimer wrote:
>   
>>  I hope we should upgrade to GPLv3 and Sun should "Dual License" the
>>  OpenSolaris via GPLv3 (or at least,GPLv3 should be CDDL compatible.).
>>     
>
> The OpenSolaris community has already stated that they do not want to
> accept GPLv3, why not discuss this with them if you want to try to
> change their minds?
>   
It was just an example came to my mind at first when thinking about 
"Dual Licensing" or upgrading Linux Kernel to the GPLv3. Yeah maybe,the 
"OpenSolaris Community" do not want GPLv3. But; IMHO, it is in the hands 
of "Sun" not the "OpenSolaris Community".

Regards,

Tarkan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/