[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070611065145.GA23404@linux-sh.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:51:45 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
"Leech, Christopher" <christopher.leech@...el.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
Wolfgang Denk <wd@...x.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm1
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 10:01:34PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Overall, I feel that async_tx is perhaps justifiably receiving the
> silent treatment because offload engines are not a mainstream
> occurrence. Currently only people with an Xscale IOP or a PPC 440spe
> [4] will notice that mainline lacks support for all the features of
> their platform. I see async_tx as a nod to the embedded space where
> offload engines act to make up for the absence of multi-Ghz CPUs with
> streaming SIMD instructions.
>
For what it's worth, I'm planning on tying in the SH DMA stuff to
the dmaengine code, as the async_tx stuff certainly has quite a few bits
of interest. This is probably something I won't get around to for 2.6.23
though, due to time constraints.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists