[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070612085730.GA17964@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:57:30 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Tobias Gerschner <tobias.gerschner@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Figueiredo <elmig@...ianpt.org>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ck@....kolivas.org
Subject: Re: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck]
Mainline plans)
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> * Tobias Gerschner <tobias.gerschner@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > I did run massive_intr.c for 60 secs with increasing nproc (
> > 10,20,30,40,50,60) waiting for effects.
> >
> > Below a small table of the results
> >
> > 2.6.21.1-cfs-v16
> >
> > nproc , usability result
> >
> > 10 , serious frame drops , Firefox hardly recognizes clicked links,
> > but still usable
> > 20 - 30, usability loss ( somehow under cfs firefox never finished
> > user requests like displaying web pages or opening new pages , no
> > feedback anymore, sudden changes on the desktop )
>
> ouch! The expected load-testing result under CFS should be something
> like this:
>
> http://bhhdoa.org.au/pipermail/ck/2007-June/007817.html
i have just tried the same workload with cfs and with sd048 from -ck,
and cannot reproduce this. To make sure it's not some other change in
-ck, could you try the pure SD patches ontop of 2.6.21.1 too:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck2/patches/2.6.21-sd-0.48.patch
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck2/patches/sched-sd-0.48-interactive_tunable.patch
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists