linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: kernel scedular

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200706121937.16959.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:37:16 +0200
From:	Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
To:	ck@....kolivas.org
Cc:	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: kernel scedular

Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:

> At least in my subjective testing I can't tell any difference anymore,
> so it boils down to design criteria, code size, ability to maintain...

And of course as needed further - preferably at least somewhat 
comparable - test scenarios and benchmarks with realistic workloads. Some 
thoughts about this:

http://bhhdoa.org.au/pipermail/ck/2007-June/007879.html

Regards,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)