[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <466DFE09.3020408@garzik.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:59:37 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@...ari.org>
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>,
james.bottomley@...eleye.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
htejun@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] Enable Aggressive Link Power management for AHCI
controllers.
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> writes:
>
>> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>>> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
>>>> Setting Effect
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>>> min_power ALPM is enabled, and link set to enter lowest
>>>> power state (SLUMBER) when idle
>>>> Hot plug not allowed.
>>>>
>>>> max_performance ALPM is disabled, Hot Plug is allowed
>>>>
>>>> medium_power ALPM is enabled, and link set to enter
>>>> second lowest power state (PARTIAL) when
>>>> idle. Hot plug not allowed.
>>> Just some food for thought:
>>> If you split it into a enable/disable (0/1) attribute, and a level
>>> attribute
>> on/off doesn't really make sense if the question is "do you favor power
>> or do you favor performance".......
>
> How about just making it a numeric scale with 0 meaning no power saving
> and then some fixed number of levels (e.g 0-9)?
The original proposal seems far more intuitive than these alternatives.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists