linux-kernel - Re: fix placement of inline keyword.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070612233842.GJ3588@stusta.de>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:38:42 +0200
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fix placement of inline keyword.

On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 07:30:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:

> gcc gets whiney about the placement of 'inline' at some warning levels.
>...

Since most of them are in C files, can you remove these when you are at it?
 
> --- linux-2.6.20.noarch/arch/ia64/sn/pci/pcibr/pcibr_ate.c~	2007-04-04 19:34:50.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.20.noarch/arch/ia64/sn/pci/pcibr/pcibr_ate.c	2007-04-04 19:34:56.000000000 -0400
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static inline u64 __iomem *pcibr_ate_add
>  /*
>   * Update the ate.
>   */
> -void inline
> +inline void
>  ate_write(struct pcibus_info *pcibus_info, int ate_index, int count,
>  	  volatile u64 ate)
>  {
>...

And some are even non-static inline functions...

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/