[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <466E0642.5020506@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:34:42 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
CC: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>,
jeff@...zik.org, james.bottomley@...eleye.com,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] AHCI Link Power Management
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This series of patches enables Aggressive Link Power Management for AHCI
>> devices, as documented in the AHCI spec. On my laptop (a Lenovo X60), this
>> saves me a full watt of power. On other systems, reported power savings
>> range from .5-1.5 Watts. It has been tested by the kind folks at #powertop
>> with similar results. Please give it a try and let me know what you think.
>
> I'm not sure about this. We need better PM framework to support
> powersaving in other controllers and some ahcis don't save much when
> only link power management is used,
do you have data to support this? The data we have from this patch is
that it saves typically a Watt of power (depends on the machine of
course, but the range is 0.5W to 1.5W). If you want to also have an
even more agressive thing where you want to start disabling the entire
controller... I don't see how this is in conflict with saving power on
the link level by "just" enabling a hardware feature ....
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists