| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <F1D642E5A91BC94D9504EC83AE19E6B01289E9@ecqcmtlmail3.quebec.int.ec.gc.ca> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:54:16 -0400 From: "Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]" <Vincent.Fortier1@...GC.CA> To: "Miguel Figueiredo" <elmig@...ianpt.org>, "linux kernel mailing list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <ck@....kolivas.org> Cc: "Con Kolivas" <kernel@...ivas.org>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "Martin Steigerwald" <Martin@...htvoll.de> Subject: RE: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans) > -----Message d'origine----- > De : linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org] De la part de > Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] > Envoyé : 12 juin 2007 21:36 > À : Miguel Figueiredo; linux kernel mailing list; ck@....kolivas.org > Cc : Con Kolivas; Ingo Molnar > Objet : RE: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: > [ck] Mainline plans) > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org > > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org] De la part de Miguel > > Figueiredo Envoyé : 11 juin 2007 20:30 > > > > Hi all, > > > > some results based on massing_intr.c by Satoru, can be found on > > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/massive_intr.c > > > > > > I know that other people, who read lkml, also tested the > same way, it > > would be nice if they also post their data. > > > > For the pleasure of comparing CPU schedulers, both CFS v16 & > full CK2 patched pre-built kernels for Fedora 7 using latest > build 3194 are now available at http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca > > There is also a not yet fully tuned YUM repository > configuration file available at > http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca/kernel/fedora/alt-sched.repo > Although I suggest you download the rpm's directly from the > web page & install both manually using rpm -ivh --force > > Have fun. > Also, now that I think of it, here are my results: Test: ./massive_intr 20 6000 Hardware: - Athlon 64 4200+ - 2GB ram - nVidia 6600GT using latest Beta driver NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-100.14.06-pkg2.run - SATA drive - On-board audio (00:04.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 AC'97 Audio Controller (rev a2)) Kernels: CFS v16 2.6.21 FC7 build 3194 CK2 2.6.21 FC7 build 3194 Here is what the TOP output was looking like for both case: top - 13:36:22 up 38 min, 4 users, load average: 20.41, 13.43, 7.49 Tasks: 172 total, 21 running, 150 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu0 : 99.7%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Cpu1 : 94.7%us, 4.6%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st Mem: 2058860k total, 1217132k used, 841728k free, 56456k buffers Swap: 1959888k total, 0k used, 1959888k free, 781636k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 6099 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 10 0.0 0:26.12 massive_intr 6102 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 10 0.0 0:26.27 massive_intr 6104 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 10 0.0 0:26.51 massive_intr 6105 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 10 0.0 0:26.32 massive_intr 6107 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 10 0.0 0:26.62 massive_intr 6112 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 10 0.0 0:26.32 massive_intr 6116 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 10 0.0 0:26.26 massive_intr 6109 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 10 0.0 0:26.32 massive_intr 6115 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 10 0.0 0:26.50 massive_intr 6118 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 9 0.0 0:26.37 massive_intr 6100 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 9 0.0 0:26.51 massive_intr 6103 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 9 0.0 0:26.24 massive_intr 6106 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 9 0.0 0:26.32 massive_intr 6108 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 9 0.0 0:26.32 massive_intr 6110 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 9 0.0 0:26.54 massive_intr 6111 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 9 0.0 0:26.37 massive_intr 6113 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 9 0.0 0:26.56 massive_intr 6114 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 9 0.0 0:26.30 massive_intr 6117 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 9 0.0 0:26.34 massive_intr 6101 megalout 20 0 7860 224 136 R 9 0.0 0:26.31 massive_intr 4681 root 20 0 196m 67m 12m S 8 3.4 4:06.00 X 6036 megalout 20 0 694m 53m 32m S 2 2.6 0:07.82 amarokapp 4904 megalout 20 0 271m 9.9m 6948 S 1 0.5 0:18.16 gkrellm 5054 megalout 20 0 160m 45m 20m S 1 2.2 0:10.90 firefox-bin 5201 megalout 20 0 160m 9304 5480 S 1 0.5 0:01.42 emerald 5210 megalout 20 0 240m 12m 6284 S 1 0.6 0:33.29 beryl CFS v16: --------- beryl interractivity way too unresponsive.. - window decoration highlight taking around 5-10 secs to switch between windows focus - window movement either impossible or animation laggy enough to not being seen at all. - Cube rotation still possible using mouse scroll although really really really laggy Amarok MP3 music: - No audio skips at all. Playing really well! CK2 patchset: ------------- Beryl interractivity almost totally unresponsive... In fact mouse movement was near-impossible to control. - window movement totally impossible - Cube rotation still possible using mouse scroll although there was no animation at all Amarok MP3 music: - Same as CFS, no skips at all. Playing really well! I'll quote Martin on the Ck mailing list: > According to Ingo most of the interactivity issues should be fixed by now. > Still I do not see how that translates to "CFS was generally better". Well, here you go: For having followed RSDL since version 0.28 I'd say Con did a really great job but for me CFS v16 now, on my hardware, offers better interactivity using beryl window manager. - vin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists