[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1181760555.8735.17.camel@spirit>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:49:15 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <hansendc@...ibm.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, akpm@...l.org, mtk-manpages@....net,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 11:32 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > dev_printk() and friends are great, since they already define
> something
> > like KMSG_COMPONENT: The driver name.
>
> They provide way more than that, they also provide the explicit device
> that is being discussed, as well as other things depending on the
> device.
Instead of keeping a list of kernel message ids somewhere, can you base
this off the dev_printk() format argument?
You could keep a list of those somewhere, extracted from the kernel
source, and correlate documentation with the _format_ instead of an
arbitrarily assigned message number.
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists