[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070613002115.GA28778@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:21:15 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fix empty macros in acpi.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 01:00:29AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 07:33:09PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > +#define DBG(x...) do { } while(0)
>
> Eh... Please, stop it - if you want a function-call-like no-op returning void,
> use ((void)0). At least that way one can say DBG(....),foo(), etc.
They both end up compiled to nothing anyway, so I'm not bothered
either way.. I'm not sure I follow why the syntax of that last part
is a good thing. It looks like something we'd want to avoid rather
than promote?
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists