[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <467064B9.1080005@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:42:17 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Toshiharu Harada <haradats@...il.com>
CC: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Toshiharu Harada <haradats@...data.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] TOMOYO Linux
Toshiharu Harada wrote:
> 2007/6/14, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>:
>> > So I think pathname based call chains are advantages for
>> > at least auditing and profiling.
>>
>> SELinux audit logs (well, whatever is in /var/log/audit on
>> my system) does show the path names of objects that fail to
>> be accessed as well as the name and context of the processes
>> trying to access them.
>>
>> This is with standard Fedora and RHEL installations.
>
> Thank you for your comment.
>
> SELinux has a well designed robust and flexible functions.
> So it should be used for everywhere. I understand it.
> As you mentioned one can analyze the system (process)
> behaviors from AVC logs. But the maintenance cost is not trivial.
>
> If logging with process context is the only purpose,
> current TOMOYO Linux can do it with no hustle at all.
Yes, but so does standard SELinux.
You are making me curious: what does TOMOYO do that is
not done by regular SELinux?
Logging with process name, path name and contexts is
already done. I must have missed some other TOMOYO
feature in your initial email...
--
All Rights Reversed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists