[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <466FBDC1.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:49:53 +0200
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To: "Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
Cc: "Venkatesh Pallipadi" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@...nborg.org>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...-64.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix improper .init-type section references
>But then why not simply lose the __exit (and .exit.*) altogether? Because
>__exit becomes redundant in the suggested changed semantics -- just mark
>all the cleanup code as __init too (when it's built-in, the only
>callsite for the
>cleanup code would be from the startup code in .init.*, and when modular,
>__init and __exit lose all relevance anyway).
Because of the non-builtin case (__init still has significance in the modular case,
it's only __exit that doesn't). For the builtin case, __init could certainly be
identical to __exit.
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists