[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3ejke6fym.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:30:25 +0200
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>,
"david@...g.hm" <david@...g.hm>,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net> writes:
> Exactly. And I don't see anything about a TiVO (or any device that, like a
> TiVO, requires binaries that run on it to be digitally signed) that stops
> you
> from exercising the "freedoms" guaranteed by the GPL. As I said before, what
> it does is stop you from violating the license on the hardware.
BTW: don't they sell their hardware (as well)? I think it should be
easy to replace the ROMs (EPROMs? flash ROMs?) using some diagnostic
clip and/or JTAG. Unless the CPU itself verifies ROM signatures,
they shouldn't matter.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists