[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87odji3hmv.fsf@graviton.dyn.troilus.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:22:32 -0400
From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@...ilus.org>
To: Matt Keenan <tank.en.mate@...il.com>
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>,
"david\@lang.hm" <david@...g.hm>,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Matt Keenan writes:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>
>> Err, no. Software, per legal definitions in Brazil, US and elsewhere,
>> require some physical support. That's the hard disk in the TiVO DVR,
>> in this case. I don't see how this matters, though.
>>
>>
> I'm now intrigued, where are these (Brazilian and US) definitions
> stipulated, and under what authority?
In the US, 17 USC 101 (the "Definitions" section of the title dealing
with Copyright) makes this definition:
A "computer program" is a set of statements or instructions to be
used directly or indirectly in a computer in order to bring about
a certain result.
As its purpose is to outline the scope of copyright law, this
definition is made under the authority granted to Congress by Article
I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution.
Michael Poole
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists