[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6934efce0706140953x2167944fr54eca6376e1f8d63@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:53:33 -0700
From: "Jared Hulbert" <jaredeh@...il.com>
To: carsteno@...ibm.com
Cc: "Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
richard.griffiths@...driver.com,
"Richard Griffiths" <res07ml0@...izon.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Jörn Engel" <joern@...ybastard.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
> An alternative approach, which does not need to have struct page at
> hand, would be to use the nopfn vm operations struct. That one would
> have to rely on get_xip_pfn.
Of course! Okay now I'm begining to understand.
> The current path would then be deprecated.
Why? Wouldn't both paths be valid options?
> If you're interrested in using the later for xip without
> struct page, I would volounteer to go ahead and implement this?
I'm very interested in this.
I'm not opposed to using struct page, but I'm confused as to how to
start that. As I understand it, which is not well, defined a
CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM region to cover the Flash memory would add that to
my pool of RAM. That would be 'bad', right? I don't see how to
create the page structs and set this memory aside as different.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists