| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <d120d5000706141016u4893c1fbp2241f847b8e1e29d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:16:01 -0400 From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> To: "Al Viro" <viro@....linux.org.uk> Cc: "Bernd Paysan" <bernd.paysan@....de>, "Krzysztof Halasa" <khc@...waw.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 On 6/14/07, Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:01:20PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > >Multiple authors == need permission from each author with enough > > >contributions to that file to make the contributions in question > > >copyrightable. > > > > > >And in my case (and case of gregkh, and...) that would be considerably > > >more than a couple of files. Really. > > > > I would expect that if you contribute to a file that explicitely says > > "GPL v2 or later" and you do not change that wording then you agree > > GPL v2 or later for that particular contribution. So for example > > drivers/net/plip.c could be changed to GPL v3 even though you > > contributed to it. > > After you exclude such cases it's still more than a couple of files... > Undoubtedly. I was just responding to neet to contact multiple authors point. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists